Subject: Re: O_SYNC vs. O_FSYNC
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Charles M. Hannum <email@example.com>
Date: 05/28/1995 02:27:07
While we're talking about third party applications and header file
compatibility, does anybody know why SunOS uses O_SYNC as its flag to
tell the kernel to do synchronous writes, while NetBSD, BSD/OS and
probably 4.4BSD use O_FSYNC?
Is O_FSYNC in the POSIX spec or something?
I suspect this is another bit of history where Berkeley did one thing,
and AT&T/USL later did something substantially similar but not *quite*
The current revision of POSIX.1 does not specify the flag by either