Subject: Re: implementing a name service switch...
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Ty Sarna <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/09/1994 02:12:05
In article <199412090015.TAA00665@pain.lcs.mit.edu>,
Chris G Demetriou <Chris_G_Demetriou@LAGAVULIN.PDL.CS.CMU.EDU> wrote:
> > I haven't looked at the code in question, so this is probably an
> > oversimplification, but the "file" code uses the db(3) routines, right?
> > Why not implement yp or NIS or whatever as dynamicly loaded db(3) access
Erps, I meant "yp or Hesiod".
> > methods, and the switch would simply allow selection of which access
> > method was handed to dbopen().
> there's no reason to overload db's interface any (more 8-).
I'm not sure it's that much of a stretch. YP's interface is sort of
> Note that i'm not strictly against a "switch" type thing which
> controlled loading of lookup methods. however, that wasn't what the
> proposal was suggesting (at least, so said my reading of the
> proposal... 8-).
Sure, I was proposing this as an alternative. Although, now that I think
about it, I like the idea of a seperate program.
Ty Sarna "You know, we live in the age of the superhighway
email@example.com information network thing..." -- Dave Letterman