Subject: Re: should we replace the shell?
To: Zdenek Salvet <email@example.com>
From: Timothy Newsham <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/08/1994 11:54:09
> > But seriously folks, Ash is a perfectly good shell, and POSIX compliant,
> > or not, I'm not going to give it up, regardless of what might be shipped
> > as /bin/sh on NetBSD in the future.
> I second that.
> I think /bin/sh should be as small and fast as possible,
> conformance and bloat-generating features be in alternative shell
> for interactive use.
The conformance should be for programming support more so than
interactive support. If someone writes a shell script that uses
features specified in a standard then it should run on the standard
NetBSD shell. Isn't that what the standard is about in the first
> Zdenek Salvet