Subject: Re: should we replace the shell?
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Zdenek Salvet <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/08/1994 13:44:12
> But seriously folks, Ash is a perfectly good shell, and POSIX compliant,
> or not, I'm not going to give it up, regardless of what might be shipped
> as /bin/sh on NetBSD in the future.
I second that.
I think /bin/sh should be as small and fast as possible,
conformance and bloat-generating features be in alternative shell
for interactive use.