Re: [PATCH 1/3] gcc: Add missing parentheses around ternary operator

To: Damien Zammit <damien%zamaudio.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] gcc: Add missing parentheses around ternary operator
From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 10:33:43 +0200

On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 05:53:09PM +1000, Damien Zammit wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> 
> Upstream gcc seems to have a different set of open flags,
> for many, many years.
> 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blob;f=libcpp/files.c;h=c93a03c69ef5b5a5d58feb7615e955e199c7f128;hb=dc033e0149fd7790b89f816041e87a6ddc22e21c#l211

Heh, ok. I think it was carried over from here:

	http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2004/11/30/0000.html

Martin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] gcc: Add missing parentheses around ternary operator
  - From: Robert Elz
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] gcc: Add missing parentheses around ternary operator
  - From: Christos Zoulas

References:
- [PATCH 0/3] - Fix rump targets for GNU/Hurd i386 && native build
  - From: Damien Zammit
- [PATCH 1/3] gcc: Add missing parentheses around ternary operator
  - From: Damien Zammit
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] gcc: Add missing parentheses around ternary operator
  - From: Martin Husemann
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] gcc: Add missing parentheses around ternary operator
  - From: Damien Zammit

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] gcc: Add missing parentheses around ternary operator
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] gcc: Add missing parentheses around ternary operator
Previous by Thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] gcc: Add missing parentheses around ternary operator
Next by Thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] gcc: Add missing parentheses around ternary operator
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index