On 06.01.2020 07:35, Martin Husemann wrote: > On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 06:06:04AM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: >> why not to pick float128 support just as-is from Berkeley SoftFLoat 3 ( >> https://github.com/ucb-bar/berkeley-softfloat-3 )? We already import >> softfloat code in our distribution. > > The softloat code in-tree already has support for 128 bit floats (and we > use it on some architectures). > > Martin > I know, but for some unknown to me reason we insist to be different with everybody else in Clang.
Description: OpenPGP digital signature