tech-toolchain archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: bmake: :sh vs :!cmd!

To: tech-toolchain%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: bmake: :sh vs :!cmd!
From: David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 04:06:34 +0000

On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 01:45:39AM -0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
 > I added :sh for compatibility. It is the same reason we support include
 > and .include etc.

Really? Which other make has :sh? I thought colon-modifiers in other
makes were pretty much limited to the suffix transform one...

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost

Follow-Ups:
- Re: bmake: :sh vs :!cmd!
  - From: Christos Zoulas

References:
- bmake: :sh vs :!cmd!
  - From: Edgar Fuß
- Re: bmake: :sh vs :!cmd!
  - From: David Holland
- Re: bmake: :sh vs :!cmd!
  - From: Christos Zoulas

Prev by Date: Re: bmake: :sh vs :!cmd!
Next by Date: unmodified binutils fails on alpha
Previous by Thread: Re: bmake: :sh vs :!cmd!
Next by Thread: Re: bmake: :sh vs :!cmd!
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index