Re: ctype(3), again

[David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 04:09:40PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
 > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 03:44:32PM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
 > > Is there something we can improve in the NetBSD headers so that clang
 > > doesn't behave more pickily and gcc in this case?
 > 
 > Uhmmm, this may not be what you'd like to hear, but: gcc *not* warning in
 > this case is a bug, isn't it? This used to work - what broke it (or why
 > isn't it doing it in this concrete case)?

gcc changes, probably to work around glibc.

A year ago when this was first discovered we put an explicit
-Wsystem-headers in base (which uncovered all kinds of lossage that
had crept in) but nobody's come up with an adequate solution for
pkgsrc.

(it's in PR 51831)

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost