tech-toolchain archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: [RFC] Improving compatibility of NetBSD's unwind.h (or replacing it?)

To: tech-toolchain%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: [RFC] Improving compatibility of NetBSD's unwind.h (or replacing it?)
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 20:09:16 +0100

On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 11:22:58PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> First we have to figure out why we have so many:

We have so many because GCC didn't provide one for its own libunwind
implementation for a very long time. I'm not even sure that it has
changed. The only copies currently in use are the one in libexecinfo for
GCC and the one in libunwind for Clang.

Joerg

References:
- [RFC] Improving compatibility of NetBSD's unwind.h (or replacing it?)
  - From: Michał Górny
- Re: [RFC] Improving compatibility of NetBSD's unwind.h (or replacing it?)
  - From: Christos Zoulas

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] Improving compatibility of NetBSD's unwind.h (or replacing it?)
Next by Date: ptrace code crash
Previous by Thread: Re: [RFC] Improving compatibility of NetBSD's unwind.h (or replacing it?)
Next by Thread: ptrace code crash
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index