re: ansi.h include guards

[matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost>]

Christos Zoulas writes:
> On Feb 9, 12:52pm, abs%netbsd.org@localhost (David Brownlee) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: ansi.h include guards
> 
> | Erk... Is there a sane _ANSI_   _MACHINE_ANSI_   _MACHINE_ARCH_ANSI_
> | pattern somewhere or is that trying to force it...
> 
> So for machines that don't have three levels, which one do you choose
> for the second level, _MACHINE_ANSI_? Also changing this would cause
> churn. And it is not only ansi.h that needs changing. I'd rather change
> things in the direction of the majority...

well, as long as the "top-level" one is consistent it should be
OK.  though, why we are caring so much about something that is
doing something wrong and gross bewilders me ;)


.mrg.