[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
re: ansi.h include guards
Christos Zoulas writes:
> On Feb 9, 12:52pm, abs%netbsd.org@localhost (David Brownlee) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: ansi.h include guards
> | Erk... Is there a sane _ANSI_ _MACHINE_ANSI_ _MACHINE_ARCH_ANSI_
> | pattern somewhere or is that trying to force it...
> So for machines that don't have three levels, which one do you choose
> for the second level, _MACHINE_ANSI_? Also changing this would cause
> churn. And it is not only ansi.h that needs changing. I'd rather change
> things in the direction of the majority...
well, as long as the "top-level" one is consistent it should be
OK. though, why we are caring so much about something that is
doing something wrong and gross bewilders me ;)
Main Index |
Thread Index |