Re: [lldb-dev] LLDB/NetBSD test suite results as of 8 Dec 2015

[Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 08.12.2015 17:21, Ed Maste wrote:
> On 7 December 2015 at 19:28, Kamil Rytarowski via lldb-dev 
> <lldb-dev%lists.llvm.org@localhost> wrote:
>> 
>> I ran the LLDB test suite of the LLDB-current version on
>> NetBSD/amd64 (v. 7.99.21).
>> 
>> The results are as follows:
>> 
>> 415 out of 415 test suites processed - TestRecursiveTypes.py
>> 
>> Ran 415 test suites (266 failed) (64.096386%) Ran 222 test cases
>> (145 failed) (65.315315%) Failing Tests (266)
>> 
>> The major missing piece is native process tracking support (with
>> the ptrace(2) interface). Once added, LLDB should start to be
>> usable on this platform.
> 
> Great progress, and thanks for the update! Are you planning to
> base the NetBSD native support on NativeProcessLinux? I need to
> migrate the FreeBSD support to work that way still.
> 


In my initial scratch (before upstreaming of the current NetBSD
support) I cloned the current FreeBSD approach. It was halfbaked,
building and not working.

I will see the NativeProcessLinux way.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=0zUx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----