[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: traditional cpp
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 4:02 PM, David Holland
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 10:56:29AM -0500, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> > > I'm told that we need a traditional cpp for moving clang forward... so
> > > I wrote one.
> > >
> > > ? http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~dholland/netbsd/tradcpp-20101220/
> > Too bad it is not portable outside NetBSD.
> It wasn't meant to be.
> Care to offer any specifics, or just FUD?
getprogname(3) is not portable outside BSDs and <stdint.h> is required
to use uintN_t types. Beside that the built-ins macros are hardcoded.
Main Index |
Thread Index |