Re: Fix -static with -lpthread

[David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 11:06:16PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
 > > > > ...why not just reference it from crt0?
 > > > 
 > > > Because it is an implementation detail of libc.
 > > 
 > > It's not like crt0 and libc are really independent, and it would be a
 > > lot less gross that way...
 > 
 > They are mostly independent. crt0 has to pull in exit(3) from libc to be
 > standard compliant and there is no real way to avoid that. 

Well yes, so what's the problem?

 > I see no good justification for adding other requirements on the
 > interface just for the sake of static linkage.

I see no good justification for attaching a mess to that requirement
to avoid making it slightly wider.

I suppose the proper solution is to make ld smarter.

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost