tech-toolchain archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

re: libgcc

   On Dec 5, 2009, at 12:07 PM, matthew green wrote:
   > i'd guess that you need to leave them in as a weak symbol
   > for all eternity, or at least until we bump
   Would not be an issue if libc had a dependency recorded against the shared 
libgcc, yes?

i had that thought too.

i don't know what the ramafications of that are though.


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index