Subject: Re: lint doesn't define __STDC__?
To: None <tech-toolchain@NetBSD.org>
From: David Holland <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/07/2007 21:43:12
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 07:49:46PM -0500, der Mouse wrote:
> >> [...] should not lint be an obsolete tool? [...compiler instead...]
> > It should for pass 1 [compiling], not for pass 2 [linking]. In
> > reality lint is pickier than the compiler.
> This, to my mind, is mostly a failing of lint. My experiences with
> lint have generally involved its producing reams of content-free
> warnings like [...]
It doesn't have to be... but that is traditional lint behavior, yes.
It ought to be made smarter, or maybe we should adopt one of the newer
program analysis toolkits.
- David A. Holland / email@example.com