Subject: Re: structure alignment on arm in NetBSD? (resend without html)
To: Richard Earnshaw <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Christos Zoulas <email@example.com>
Date: 10/30/2007 13:26:45
On Oct 30, 4:32pm, firstname.lastname@example.org (Richard Earnshaw) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: structure alignment on arm in NetBSD? (resend without html)
| On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 16:18 +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| > In article <email@example.com>,
| > Richard Earnshaw <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
| > >Nope, I do think I ever said that (the problem was that the EABI was
| > >still in development at the time we needed to freeze our ELF
| > >implementation). In fact, I'd like to see NetBSD supporting the EABI
| > >now that it has stabilized. We'll need to have some support in the
| > >kernel anyway in order to support more recent ARM/Linux binaries.
| > I am guessing that this is the reason I am getting SIGILL on linux
| > binaries, after the uname call.
| It could be. A sure way to tell would be to look at the version of
| ld-linux.so that is being required. If it's ld-linux.so.2 then it's a
| non-eabi image. If it's ld-linux.so.3 then it's the new EABI.
It is a static binary, but very recent.