Subject: Re: Request for comments: let config(1) generate LKMs
To: Hiroyuki Bessho <>
From: Martin Husemann <>
List: tech-toolchain
Date: 09/13/2007 13:34:24
There are two parts to this:

 - generate the module - I don't see how config(1) is involved here

 - load the right modules with proper args (modload/lkm.conf) - and
   I don't quite see how config(1) would be usefull there either,
   sounds more like we need some extensions to config(9)

(Side remark: we should ignore indirect configuration busses and always require
manual lkm.conf editing for them, IMHO.)

Sorry, but I guess I did not quite understand what you are proposing,
could you please explain?