Subject: Re: Getting rid of sh5 support in sh3 binutils and gdb?
To: None <tech-toolchain@NetBSD.org>
From: Valeriy E. Ushakov <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/25/2006 01:02:16
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 06:52:06 +0300, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:
> Attached patch teaches gdb to not include sh5 support for sh3 targets.
> I don't know why toolchain people made the decision to include sh5
> support by default, i don't think this is usually the case for either
> sparc (vs sparc64), i386 (vs amd64), ppc (vs ppc64) - where 64 bit
> variant needs to be requested explicitely.
> I wonder if we should also apply relevant parts to binutils as well.
BTW, gas configured for sh- (or sh* with endian suffixes) does NOT
email@example.com | Zu Grunde kommen
http://snark.ptc.spbu.ru/~uwe/ | Ist zu Grunde gehen