Subject: Re: gcc3 deletion To: Adam <firstname.lastname@example.org> From: Richard Earnshaw <email@example.com> List: tech-toolchain Date: 11/03/2006 11:40:14
On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 11:10 +0100, Adam wrote:
> By the way, is there a reason we don't have f77 anymore? :)
Because there is no f77 in gcc-4. It's in the process of being replaced
with f95; but that's still somewhat of a work-in-progress.