Subject: Re: using MKSTATICLIB part 2
To: None <>
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <>
List: tech-toolchain
Date: 09/11/2006 10:25:48
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 01:57:17PM +1000, Simon Burge wrote:
> Oh, one more point...  Using MKSTATICLIB=no also causes failures
> for programs that use MKPRIVATELIB libraries.  Is the following
> OK to commit as well?

What about introducing a new variable FORCE_STATICLIB or so instead?
That would avoid the problem Luke mentioned.