Subject: Re: gdb attach
To: matthew green <email@example.com>
From: Nick Hudson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/18/2006 11:53:36
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 10:58, matthew green wrote:
> In looking at 32076 I wonder if instead of bringing back solib-legacy we
> could go down the route of using procfs to assist attach. This means the
> symbols can be read and the ABI get initialised correctly. The downside is
> that /proc needs to mounted:
> (gdb) attach 12155
> Attaching to process 12155
> /proc/12155/file: No such file or directory.
> which is better than gdb crashing.
> Anyone object to this?
> this only matters for when you don't tell gdb a filename, right?
> in any case, is there a way to use solib-legacy as a fall back
> if /proc is not mounted?
I don't thnk so.