James Chacon <jmc@NetBSD.org>  writes:
>Well..you can build make w/o building any of the tools or the compat directory
>so I'm not seeing the issue here.

That's true today sure, but you're talking about changing things no?
I was simply pointing out that the current ability to build
standalone tools like "make" natively is useful and shouldn't be broken.

>build.sh makewrapper

Actually just 'make' in usr.bin/make works fine ;-)
Though I do actually use a generic wrapper.

--sjg