Subject: Re: ld --as-needed broken ?
To: Todd Vierling <tv@duh.org>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
List: tech-toolchain
Date: 05/12/2005 22:31:45 
On May 12, 2005, at 10:01 PM, Todd Vierling wrote:

> Hm.  Perhaps it's me, but I don't see libc.so there.  8-)
>
> (Meaning:  While it exists for *some* libraries, it's missing in  
> quite many
> cases.)

Well, every app has to link against libc, so it's kind of redundant,  
yes?

-- thorpej