Subject: re: iso.diff
To: Nick Hudson <>
From: matthew green <>
List: tech-toolchain
Date: 12/11/2004 01:37:17
   On Friday 19 November 2004 08:50, Jason R. Fink wrote:
   > > > It can create bootable and non-bootable images.
   > >
   > > Why non-bootable ones?
   > When I originally started it there was an idea that having
   > a non bootable option would be good if, for example,
   > you only wanted to capture srcsets or wanted it to
   > only be a data cd (eg you accidentally left it in the
   > drive).
   > I'm still on the fence as to whether or not the noboot
   > option is really needed.
   I don't think its worth it.
   Just my 0.02GBP

i do.

it saves me having to type "cd etc" and then cut'n'paste the
nbmake-wrapper path in, add "iso-image", and hit return...