Subject: re: iso.diff
To: Nick Hudson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: matthew green <email@example.com>
Date: 12/11/2004 01:37:17
On Friday 19 November 2004 08:50, Jason R. Fink wrote:
> > > It can create bootable and non-bootable images.
> > Why non-bootable ones?
> When I originally started it there was an idea that having
> a non bootable option would be good if, for example,
> you only wanted to capture srcsets or wanted it to
> only be a data cd (eg you accidentally left it in the
> I'm still on the fence as to whether or not the noboot
> option is really needed.
I don't think its worth it.
Just my 0.02GBP
it saves me having to type "cd etc" and then cut'n'paste the
nbmake-wrapper path in, add "iso-image", and hit return...