On Friday 10 December 2004 14:37, matthew green wrote:
>    On Friday 19 November 2004 08:50, Jason R. Fink wrote:
[snip]
>    > I'm still on the fence as to whether or not the noboot
>    > option is really needed.
>
>    I don't think its worth it.
>
>    Just my 0.02GBP
>
>
> i do.
>
> it saves me having to type "cd etc" and then cut'n'paste the
> nbmake-wrapper path in, add "iso-image", and hit return...

I meant I don't think it's worth having a boot/noboot switch - I'd like a 
build.sh iso option. As its already done I'm not going to complain if it gets 
committed.

Nick