Subject: Re: Option to make cpp(1) not accept named pipes or devices as
To: Andrew Brown <>
From: Eric Christopher <>
List: tech-toolchain
Date: 11/29/2004 21:00:17
> >
> >That's why I chose the route I did, anyway...
> that's a decent argument, but imho a flag is still a better way to do
> it.

Agreed, though admittedly I can't think of a whole lot of reasons to
have a switch and not just refuse to accept named pipes or devices.