=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I've ported both gcc-3.4 and gdb 6.1. These packages are on WIP. gcc-3.4 is=
 in=20
rather good shape in i86 and amd64.

gdb 6.1 is usable on these platforms. I'm actively working on it.

On Wednesday 05 May 2004 11:38 am, you wrote:
> In article <200405050913.LAA0000147410@zel459.zel.kfa-juelich.de>,
>
> Matthias Drochner <M.Drochner@fz-juelich.de> wrote:
> >In conjunction with gcc's Ada support the question came up
> >whether it is better to fix amd64 support on gdb5 (where Ada
> >support exists), or to add Ada support to gdb6 (which supports
> >NetBSD/amd64).
> >So is there already a plan to pull gdb6 into the main tree?
> >What about gcc-3.4?
>
> I'll be doing gdb-6 after another suck^Wvolunteer finishes 3.4
> integration. So the answer is that it is better to work on adding
> ada to gdb-6 (from all perspectives).
>
> christos

=2D --=20

John R. Shannon
john@johnrshannon.com
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkCZMYwACgkQOKbCxya4HYso2gCfcI8W13hMNc3Jwkj0iVPd3bP2
cggAoJmqyED1AciFtMpt/OEPz/jg2tFI
=3DyWUv
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----