On Nov 11, 2003, at 1:23 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:

> I'm not suggesting for a moment that we copy the source or even objects
> compiled from the source (though that wouldn't necessarily violate the
> license on those files, since they have a special exception if the 
> library
> is compiled with gcc -- and that certainly applies to objects linked 
> from
> a libgcc_pic) but rather that we should implement the functionality in
> libc.  We've done most of them already, and the few softfloat functions
> that are missing are relatively trivial to add to softfloat.c.

Aha, yes, OK.  I totally agree with implementing the rest of the 
softfloat functionality in libc; our softfloat library is better than 
GCC's anyway.

         -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>