-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Jason Thorpe wrote:

>
>On Wednesday, September 17, 2003, at 06:19  PM, Jim Wise wrote:
>
>> That said, given that using -traditional-cpp for .S assembly source
>> pre-processing brings in subtle differences in pre-processor syntax
>> between our c and assembly language source files, is there any reason
>> _we_ should continue to use -traditional-cpp?
>>
>> Are there any platforms where gas/gcc do not provide a
>> modern-cpp-friendly assembly syntax?
>>
>
>Yes.  ARM and SH are two that pop to mind immediately.  ARM was the one
>used to justify continuing traditional preprocessor support in GCC 3.3.

Hmm, okay.

In that case, barring eventual adoption of an alternate syntax for
these, I guess we have to keep doing things this way.

A shame, really.

- -- 
				Jim Wise
				jwise@draga.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQE/afDtRxzMSZ/9vAMRAhQRAKCvLPcOTAg3bX5IB8hu3iDwebs36QCfdWFS
Co4hJ8/QLnPt0jIph2Tbws0=
=4A7/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----