Subject: Re: Making the (asm) world safe for modern cpp
To: Jim Wise <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
Date: 09/18/2003 10:46:25
On Wednesday, September 17, 2003, at 06:19 PM, Jim Wise wrote:
> That said, given that using -traditional-cpp for .S assembly source
> pre-processing brings in subtle differences in pre-processor syntax
> between our c and assembly language source files, is there any reason
> _we_ should continue to use -traditional-cpp?
> Are there any platforms where gas/gcc do not provide a
> modern-cpp-friendly assembly syntax?
Yes. ARM and SH are two that pop to mind immediately. ARM was the one
used to justify continuing traditional preprocessor support in GCC 3.3.
-- Jason R. Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>