Subject: Re: Softfloat and GCC
To: Ben Harris <bjh21@NetBSD.org>
From: Jason Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/16/2003 10:31:33
On Tuesday, September 16, 2003, at 06:19 AM, Ben Harris wrote:
> This suggests that if there's anything that's implemented in both libc
> libgcc then the only time the libc version will be used (in a static
> executable) is when it's used by libc and nothing in the application
> used it. This seems really rather ugly to me. Maybe I should try to
> understand how it works for dynamic executables, though I suspect that
> will make my head hurt.
I think we need to make sure that the libgcc never contains softfloat.
The softfloat in our libc is better than libgcc's (for one, it supports
the basic FP exception stuff).
I remember doing this for the SH target in GCC 3.x, but we should
probably make a sweep through all of the GCC configurations.
-- Jason R. Thorpe <email@example.com>