>>Log Message:
>>vi
>a/ could we have meaningful log messages

	guess i've botched keyboard input.  will fix.

>b/ could you please explain why it is necessary to strlcpy() in this
>case?  You've just made it necessary to add strlcpy() to the next version
>of bmake for little benefit - copying a fixed sized string into a known
>sized buffer isn't the stuff of buffer overflows.

	i'm not finished yet.  there are other strcpy i will be updating.

>Or are you planning to replace all str*cpy calls in the tree with strlcpy?
>I'm sure there are places that warrant it - even within make - but
>this specific case doesn't appear to be one.

	yes

itojun