Subject: Re: X-build sparc64 => prep fails with "cc1 got fatal signal 11"
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/14/2003 06:40:29
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 08:44:17AM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 01:10:23AM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> > I think we should do more serious regression testing of *->*, not only
> > i386->*.
> I don't see the point. Most host/target variants just work.
> We fix problems as they are found - and besides powerpc and i386, what
> are realistic cross compile hosts others would expect to work? So
> no need for systematic regression tests, IMHO.
arm, prep. Wait - we can't boot the latter yet multi-user (or do I confuse
prep with chrp?)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----