Subject: Re: X-build sparc64 => prep fails with "cc1 got fatal signal 11"
To: None <tech-toolchain@netbsd.org>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <is@netbsd.org>
List: tech-toolchain
Date: 05/14/2003 06:40:29
--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 08:44:17AM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 01:10:23AM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> > I think we should do more serious regression testing of *->*, not only
> > i386->*.
> 
> I don't see the point. Most host/target variants just work.
> 
> We fix problems as they are found - and besides powerpc and i386, what
> are realistic cross compile hosts others would expect to work? So
> no need for systematic regression tests, IMHO.

arm, prep. Wait - we can't boot the latter yet multi-user (or do I confuse
prep with chrp?)

Regards,
	-is

--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQE+wci9PCRcZ/VMtk4RAuBVAJ0aLo8zg+x4fXOQu/1SFAt926X9OgCfckIA
uM+OpME9NFM4s0qZFKkxdik=
=SBsN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq--