Subject: re: RFC: splitting out libopcodes from libbfd.
To: matthew green <email@example.com>
From: Todd Vierling <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/23/2003 23:41:23
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, matthew green wrote:
: So how does the GNU-typical build handle this if --with-unified-bfd is given
: to "configure"?
: this is irrelevant. GNU-style builds build them separately so the
: problem seen in the netbsd tree only exists there.
"./configure --with-unified-bfd" was the model upon which the original
NetBSD libbfd was built, and was still there as of binutils 2.11.2 (I
haven't checked since then). IMNSHO, they're so interdependent that there's
no point separating them, so GNU's wrong. <cynical grin>
But "whatever works"....
-- Todd Vierling <email@example.com>