Subject: Re: crunchgen changes to use symbol renaming instead of symbolhiding
To: Izumi Tsutsui <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: James Chacon <email@example.com>
Date: 01/22/2003 15:19:16
Nothing should stop adding patches locally to our binutils. Thats part
of the point of importing them in. It was getting the patches back to the
maintainers that was the sticking point in the past but that should mostly
be moot now with a designated point of contact.
>In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> At Wed, 22 Jan 2003 05:05:16 +0000 (UTC), "Simon Burge" wrote:
>> > to do this, I've included a patch from
>> > Chris Demetriou that he posted to the binutils mailling list in
>> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-09/msg00505.html
>> probably should make sure it's in binutils before putting it in the
>> NetBSD sources...
>If this objcopy patch won't be integrated to binutils soon,
>how about BFD'fied crunchide (toolchain/19016) for now?
>(Of cource I think the objcopy patch is better, though..)