Subject: Re: compiler tweak offered
To: Bill Studenmund <email@example.com>
From: David Laight <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/26/2002 22:52:08
> I thought QuickBasic supported named continues/breaks for quite a while.
> They used the name of the for loop variable if I remember right.
All (well probably many) BA(P)SIC (P for purpose) do that, can get
quite lively since you aren't necesselery sure where 'next i'
will take you on an adequetely badly structured (ie typical)
(break isn't traditional though - no definition of the end of
OTOH maybe basic looks as much like the basic I 'learnt' as
modern fortran looks like fortran IV (or even II).
David Laight: email@example.com