Subject: Re: compiler tweak offered
To: Greg A. Woods <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Bill Studenmund <email@example.com>
Date: 08/26/2002 14:37:34
On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> [ On Sunday, August 25, 2002 at 09:19:41 (+0200), Alan Barrett wrote: ]
> > Subject: Re: compiler tweak offered
> Ah, yes, that makes more sense to me too, and if I'm not mistaken
> there's already prior art for using labels on 'continue' and 'break' (I
I thought QuickBasic supported named continues/breaks for quite a while.
They used the name of the for loop variable if I remember right.