Subject: Re: New checkflist mechanism too strict ?
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Luke Mewburn <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/23/2002 03:03:08
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 03:36:24PM +0100, David Laight wrote:
| > The addition of "make checkflist" was added to the "maketars" target in
| > distrib/sets/Makefile to ensure that the generated tar files have all
| > the appropriate contents.
| Another thought, for an UNPRIVED build isn't it the contents of the
| METALOG file that control what ends up in the tar archive, not the
| contents of the directory tree?
| So is this test checking the right thing?
Yes, it should be (now).
It was my examination of the tar files that were the result of the
UNPRIVED auto-builds of netbsd-1-6  that lead me to making the
changes in distrib/sets/checkflist rev 1.15 (and associated changes)
to detect that the there were inconsistencies between the set lists
and the generated tar files, and complain if any were found.
 available from ftp://releng.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-daily/