Subject: Re: New checkflist mechanism too strict ?
To: Patrick Welche <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Luke Mewburn <email@example.com>
Date: 07/23/2002 02:34:52
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 02:38:25PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
| Not that I've checked, but what of a release built with eg MKKERBEROS=no
| so eg kinit just wouldn't be there? Is it just something to ignore as then
| it isn't a standard release?
Yes, we probably need to work a clean solution out for the cases where
you want to build a release (including tar files) with MKxxx=no.
However, it is not an urgent requirement and can wait until after 1.6
is out the door :-)