Subject: Re: DRAFT toolchain upgrade plan
To: Jason R Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Perry E. Metzger <email@example.com>
Date: 05/28/2002 17:05:59
Jason R Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 04:08:14PM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> > I tend to agree. IMHO, we should just plan on switching to 3.2 when it
> > arrives and testing a lot before then so we'll be pretty sure it works
> > on arrival.
> Ok, well, I'll see what I can do about back-porting my patches to 3.1, but
> that doesn't address the target support issues for 3.1 (back-porting some
> of those is going to be tricky).
That wasn't what I meant -- I don't think, given the performance
issues etc., that we really want to be using 3.1 in-tree. We should
just use external toolchains for superh, ns32k and x86-64 for now,
IMHO. Remember, for SuperH, the SH5 support isn't even fully in 3.1
Or do you think we really need a newer toolchain soon?
Perry E. Metzger email@example.com
NetBSD: The right OS for your embedded design. http://www.wasabisystems.com/