Subject: Re: Shared object handling proposed change.
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Christos Zoulas <email@example.com>
Date: 05/21/2002 17:03:39
In article <20020521125849.A10965@noc.untraceable.net>,
Andrew Brown <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> >3. Change host generated object files to ".ho" [".lo" was used before and
>>> > not documented in bsd.README] and beautify the rule.
>>> I've heard only 2 positive and 0 negative remarks about this, so I will
>>> proceed with the change after the branch. This is the last time to voice
>>Well, there is the obvious one that came up when I chose .lo in the first
>>place. ".ho" sounded either too santa-clausy, or like we were putting on
>>the red light. :-)
>how about .mo, for "machine (dependant) object"?
but that has the opposite meaning, no? By "machine" we usually refer to the