Subject: make release vs make iso-image
To: None <>
From: Tracy Di Marco White <>
List: tech-toolchain
Date: 04/04/2002 12:16:03
I think 'make release' should build into $RELEASEDIR/$arch/ or such, so
that make iso-image would create what sysinst expects.  sysinst tends to
expect /i386/binary/sets for example, and make iso-image defaults to
creating /binary/sets.  Is this an unreasonable change, is there a better