Subject: Re: C++ program handling in bsd.prog.mk
To: Todd Vierling <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jason R Thorpe <email@example.com>
Date: 01/04/2002 10:53:40
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 01:34:54PM -0500, Todd Vierling wrote:
> Looks fine to me, albeit that -lstdc++ -lm should always be included. I
> know it's not "needed" for groff and gcc 2.95, but it's a good idea to make
> it consistent, since linking with "c++" without DESTDIR will add them.
Hm? We don't add -lgcc to the command line for non-DESTDIR builds...,
so why do it for libstdc++ -lm?
-- Jason R. Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>