Subject: Re: C++ program handling in
To: Todd Vierling <>
From: Jason R Thorpe <>
List: tech-toolchain
Date: 01/04/2002 10:53:40
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 01:34:54PM -0500, Todd Vierling wrote:

 > Looks fine to me, albeit that -lstdc++ -lm should always be included.  I
 > know it's not "needed" for groff and gcc 2.95, but it's a good idea to make
 > it consistent, since linking with "c++" without DESTDIR will add them.

Hm?  We don't add -lgcc to the command line for non-DESTDIR builds...,
so why do it for libstdc++ -lm?

        -- Jason R. Thorpe <>