Subject: Re: "comparison is always true" and -fshort-enums
To: Ben Harris <email@example.com>
From: Martin Husemann <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/23/2001 11:10:51
> This warning is correct (the enum is being represented as an unsigned
> char), but the test is useful on other architectures, so I'd rather not
> remove it.
Just out of curiosity, can you elaborate how/why the test is usefull on other
archs? Besides some (IMHO) realy bad hacks I can't imagine why this if would
The only thing that springs to my mind is checking for arbitrary ints passed
insted of enum values, which I would test via a double cast in this case:
if ((unsigned int)arg > (unsigned int)BAZ) /* arg not in enum foo */
But basically I would consider such calls illegal.