Subject: Re: Autoconf for toolchain "replacement library"?
To: James Chacon <email@example.com>
From: Todd Vierling <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/13/2001 16:39:55
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, James Chacon wrote:
: You can't go halfway. Having something which requires a regen in the tree
: without also providing the tools to do the regen is just insane.
Not necessarily insane, but I can agree that it's hairy. `I'll get back to
(Autoconf appears to require only a few GNUisms in m4. I may be able to
emulate enough to make gm4 unnecessary. If this is possible, autoconf would
be imported minimally under src/tools, and would not be built/installed to
TOOLDIR by default -- it would have to be built manually.)
-- Todd Vierling <email@example.com> * Wasabi & NetBSD: Run with it.
-- CDs, Integration, Embedding, Support -- http://www.wasabisystems.com/