Subject: Re: Normalizing kernel cross-build support, take 2
To: None <>
From: Tom Spindler <>
List: tech-toolchain
Date: 09/09/2001 17:29:17
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 03:29:45PM -0700, Jason R Thorpe wrote:
> + CPP?=		${TOOLPREFIX}cpp

Should cpp still be given as a direct path, or should it be the
output from `gcc -print-prog-name=cpp`? I ask because by default
the pkgsrc cross/* packages don't seem to generate a cpp binary
(or none that I've seen do.) This may be considered a pkgsrc
problem, however.

I vaguely recall some silliness with cpp in gcc 3.0 that's related,
but that's even more afield of the question at head.

(All those caveats said, I'm all for your patch.)