Subject: Re: [email@example.com: Re: kern/11961: ld.so(1) manual is misguiding about LD_PRELOAD]
To: Klaus Klein <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: John Hawkinson <jhawk@MIT.EDU>
Date: 05/16/2001 11:31:30
Klaus Klein <email@example.com> wrote on Wed, 16 May 2001
at 11:50:31 +0200 in <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> > What's the scoop on the LD_PRELOAD format change?
> Speaking of the guilty party in question, the idea is that the
> behavior of the ELF dynamic loader should closely follow SVR4, where
> the format originates from; all the implementations I've seen so far
> match this.
No opinions on backwards compatibility?
I guess if no one complained...still, it seems worth a bit of documentation
effort to me.