Subject: Re: duplicate afterdepend target
To: None <tech-toolchain@netbsd.org>
From: Christos Zoulas <christos@zoulas.com>
List: tech-toolchain
Date: 02/16/2001 13:49:28
In article <200102160342.WAA00557@dragon.tools.gtei.net>,
 <jchacon@genuity.net> wrote:
>What about when they're targets like "afterdepend" which the share/mk stuff
>doesn't seem to .if protect?
>
>Should all of those when found get wrapped?

Yes, I believe these should be protected in share/mk so that they can
be overriden.

christos