Subject: Re: duplicate afterdepend target
To: Christos Zoulas <christos@zoulas.com>
From: None <jchacon@genuity.net>
List: tech-toolchain
Date: 02/15/2001 22:42:27
What about when they're targets like "afterdepend" which the share/mk stuff
doesn't seem to .if protect?

Should all of those when found get wrapped?

James

>
>In article <20010212080748.C28335@beverly.kleinbus.org>,
>Ignatios Souvatzis <is@beverly.kleinbus.org> wrote:
>
>remove/protect the one that should not be executed by
>adding .if commands(target) around it. Look at the commits in the
>i386 stand Makefiles as a guide.
>
>christos
>>
>>So it didn't work before, either. Hm, now the difficult question:
>>what should happen instead?
>>
>>	-is
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>