Subject: Re: ld_elf.so proposal for selecting hw/dependent libraries
To: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
From: Christos Zoulas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/12/1999 17:25:45
On Dec 12, 2:06pm, email@example.com (Jason Thorpe) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: ld_elf.so proposal for selecting hw/dependent libraries
| Great! This is cool!
| How does it handle defaults, tho? I suppose we have library build
| infrastructure to take care of this?
The defaults will be done by the build system using symlinks. This is
so, that even with a missing ld.so.conf the system functions properly.
| Also, what about just portions of libraries? e.g. BWX-optimized string
| routines on Alpha?
This becomes harder. Maybe providing libstrbwx.so and enhancing the syntax
c cpu_model 21164A,21164PC,21264:strbwx,c
So that strbwx is prepended to libc, and it resolves the symbols before
libc is scanned. I'll have to be careful though, not to evaluate the rules
| Also, do the return values have to be ints, or can they be strings?
Yes, they are all normalized to strings [so I can use simpler data structures]
| I'm thinking of the Alpha case again, here. We can't just key off
| "21164" ... BWX appears in "21164A" (EV56), "21164PC" (PCA56), and
| "21264" (EV6).